Tampilkan postingan dengan label shocking. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label shocking. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 20 Mei 2016

How Does North Korea Make Money

For us in the West, North Korea is a rather mysterious country in many aspects. A combination of government secrecy (very few updates on the nation are publicly released), strict control over entrance into the nation by foreigners and Western dislike of the DPRKs authorities mean that we know very little for certain about the country.
One of the enigmas surrounding the nation lie in its economy. While its economy is pretty much in dire straits (its annual growth of 0.8% is deemed as stagnating, per capita income is estimated to be $1-2k per year), the country continues to maintain a huge military expenditure (as evidenced by the recent reported hydrogen bomb tests). The DPRK spends around $10bn, according to International observers, on its military- a quarter of the total national GDP, among the highest rates in the world. North Korea must be getting some reliable income to be able to maintain this spending, but where from? How does the DPRKs economy function with its doors of trade largely closed to todays globalised world?

1. (Narrow) International Trade
Textiles constitutes a significant part in the North Korean
economy, but is secondary to commodities.

North Korea exports roughly $2.7bn worth of materials every year, a notably large proportion of these exports being derived from primary industry. Mining in particular plays a massive role in keeping North Korean trade afloat, with coal and iron constituting over 46% of the nations exports. Other products exported from the DPRK include clothing, molluscs (according to the OEC North Koreas 6th most valuable export, no kidding) and fur.

Nevertheless, it is evident that North Korea is heavily dependent upon its primary sector, on the commodities (coal, iron, etc) whose prices are constantly fluctuating. The impact of these fluctuations on North Korea is amplified by this dependence, meaning their economy would be far more damaged by a fall in coal prices, for example, than other nations whose economies are far more diverse. NKs exports have given them a tightrope to walk upon- as opposed to the kind of solid, wide platform most countries would ideally like to have.

But not only does North Koreas product lack diversity, but its list of trade partners does as well. The countrys lack of extensive diplomatic ties with other nations has resulted in China receiving 84% of NKs exports, followed far behind by Indonesia, which receives just 2%. This is the same when you look at North Koreas imports. 84.5% of NKs imports come from China- India follows with just 5%.

So not only are North Korea extremely sensitive to global commodity prices, but also to the performance of China. Currently the Chinese economy is relatively stable, but could a catastrophe hit, North Korea would see a severe lack of supplies, one even more deadly than it is experiencing right now.

But it would be foolish to put this off as a long-term economic problem. Kevin Stahler from the Peterson Institute of Economics claims the countrys lack of economic diversity is already hitting growth. "Just as it [North Korea] rode the resource boom to its apex in 2011, it is now the victim of a steady and steep decline in world prices."

2. Tourism
North Koreas state tourism is becoming more popular to
travellers from outside the region.

Its reputation in the West has written off to many the idea of ever travelling to North Korea, but it is indeed possible, and its not even that complicated. You just need to have two guides prepared to accompany you on a pre-planned tour, which can be organised via a number of online tour operators. It may not be totally convenient ("Its not possible to travel independently in North Korea", according to tour operator Gill Leaning), but it is an opportunity available to those who wish to take it.

Its easy to travel to North Korea because the authorities there see tourism as a potential source for a great amount of income and economic activity. Their increased efforts particularly in the past few years have seen the number of visits to DPRK growing. For example, Leaning claims to have received a 400% increase in booking enquiries in 2012, largely thanks to the nations 100 year anniversary and the governments heavy publicity of the occasion.

It is difficult to attain the precise figures for how much income tourism brings, but what is more certain is that, currently, the majority of the DPRKs 100,000 guests a year are Chinese. "About 80% of the tourists who come are from neighbouring countries," says Kim Sang Hak, a senior North Korean economist. "Its normal to develop tourism within your region... but we are also expanding to European countries as well.". In explaining his countries target to increase tourism to two million people a year by 2020, Hak affirms that "Tourism can produce a lot of profit relative to the investment required, so thats why our country is putting priority on it."

3. The Black Market

The North Korean-built African Renaissance
Monument in Senegal.
While the North Korean economy does produce something, looking at figures such as the GDP per capita earlier mentioned, it is evidently not performing particularly well. It is widely believed that the DPRK has been and still is involved in some more questionable dealings to try to further boost its revenues. The governments sale of labour workers to Russia and China has been relatively well documented. While exporting labour itself is not something unusual, the taking of up to 70% of the workers earnings as loyalty payments by the North Korean government makes this dealing particularly shady. This exporting of workers not only brings North Korea revenue, but it brings revenue in the form of US Dollars, providing the government with a far safer, stable currency than its own Won.
North Korea also exports monuments and statues of national leaders to other countries. These can be seen throughout Africa, in countries such as Senegal (pictured), and the Mansudae Art Studio, the Pyongyang-based company responsible for most of these works, had even created one for Germany in 2005.

However shady one might consider these deals to be, they are technically legal- and according to NPR, they brought in around $2bn in 2009. But there is a darker side to the North Korean economy, that involves drugs, counterfeit money, and weaponry.

According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2001 North Korea made somewhere between $500m and $1bn from illegal drug sales. The late 20th century saw growing opium exports from the DPRK, but more recently crystal meth has been growing in popularity, not just outside the country but internally, where "People with chronic disease take it until theyre addicted," according to an NGO worker in an interview with journalist Isaac Fish. "They take it for things like cancer. This drug is their sole form of medication."

Counterfeiting money has also been a tactic used by the North Korean government, usually of the dollar in attempts to destabilise the American economy. Making the government up to $25m a year, the USA has actively moved to stop this, by introducing a new $100 bill in 2013 specifically designed to prevent further North Korean counterfeits.
Read More..

Senin, 25 April 2016

My Advertising Pays Why I Quit The Shocking Truth!

My Advertising Pays - Why I Quit, The Shocking Truth! 
If youve seen my previous posts, youll remember what I was going to do with My Advertising Pays.

Well I quit! Well, what I really mean is I quit building up my account for the month of December! As you know I had this big dilemma about whether to continue re-purchasing, above 950 Packs, or maintain that level and withdraw money at the end of the month.
So I finally decided that as we are moving house, the extra money would come in handy, and it also reinforces the, "Proof, progress, results", mantra that some on-line marketers like to use. 

So as of the 1st December I have been maintaining 945 Credit Packs (and slightly more occasionally).
What has this achieved ?
Well, from 00.01am (UK time) on the 1st December, to midnight of the 3rd December my profit (whilst maintaining those packs) was $510 !

So thats an average of around $160+ earnings per day,
which would equate to approximately $4800 per month,
OR 
for anyone in the UK = £3500 per month!
  Remember this is real, not just figures on a screen.
These are earnings that I can withdraw, no matter what nonsense you may read in some unscrupulous sites on the net. 

Of course these results are not typical, and it has taken me personally 18 months to get to this point.

Some may get to the same point and higher quicker, for others, the journey may be slower.        
Read More..

Kamis, 10 Maret 2016

Economic Sanctions on Iran Have They Worked




















A massive moment in international relations today saw an agreement settled between Iran and the P5+1, that accepts (though limits) Irans right to nuclear energy, while lifting the economic sanctions placed upon the Middle Eastern power for the past decade.

There is much debate over whether the sanctions placed on Iran were effective. The American government has been a champion of economic restrictions, believing that causing economic troubles could pressurise the Iranian government into giving in over its nuclear energy program- and, from a rather cynical point of view, perhaps in the long term even stir up public resentment of the government to the point of its toppling. It wouldnt be surprising- for the US of course was a major force behind the 1953 coup of Irans first ever elected authority.

But back to the point, there are numerous critics of the sanctions. A primary argument on this side has been that the sanctions have simply been a form of collective punishment, that has stirred resentment among Iranians not for their own government as intended, but rather the Western governments imposing these sanctions that are having crippling effects on their lives.
 _________________________________________________________________________________
SANCTION EXPANSION- The 5 most significant bans enforced by sanctions put on Iran
- The sale of weaponry and nuclear technology to Iran (enforced by the United Nations)
- The purchasing of arms from Iran (UN)
- The import of Iranian oil and gas (European Union)
- Any dealing with Iranian banks and financial institutions (EU)
- The freezing of assets* of individuals and organisations believed to be supporting the nuclear 
program, and where applicable a ban on their entering the EU. (EU)
_________________________________________________________________________________

Iranian business did suffer as a result of the sanctions- Irans oil exports fell by almost two-thirds in the two years following the first sanctions put on them in 2011, costing the country from 4 to 8 billion dollars according to Irans oil minister. Oil revenue provided for almost half of Irans government expenditure, meaning that such a hard hit on the Iranian oil industry, combined with Iranian exile from many of the worlds financial institutions, translated into a weak currency, leading to inflation reaching as high as 40%. This high inflation has been the primary source of many of the economic hardships faced by the Iranian people in the past decade.

A Gallup poll from 2012 reflects particularly well the suffering faced by Iranian society since the first round of sanctions in 2006, and how this has translated into staunch opposition of Western powers. The poll, which followed EU sanctions banning oil imports from Iran, found that 48% of Iranians had experienced a lack of money to purchase food supplies for their families in the past year, a strong contrast to just 15% in 2005. There is no doubt that this has contributed to the US government having an approval rating of just 7% among Iranians.

In a climate in which many are already disillusioned and frustrated with Western (primarily American) foreign policy in the Middle East, many Iranians see these sanctions as an extension of their interference in the region, an attempt to punish Iran for often vocally opposing the West.

So it seems evident that sanctions have done little in their objective to stir up significant Iranian resentment against their own government; in fact it appears they have worked against western interests.

But what about pressure on the Iranian government? Has the sanctions program played a leading role in finally drawing Iran and the West to an agreement on the negotiations table?

One could conclude that sanctions were effective in pressurising the Iranian government by going straight to the end result. Iran agreed to limiting its nuclear activity, in exchange for removal of economic sanctions- so the sanctions worked, right?

But it could also be argued that there were numerous other motivations for Iran to come and agree at the negotiating table. Arguably even more important than the removal of sanctions, the deal can potentially put to rest a lot of the diplomatic tensions between Iran and the West. Previous negotiations have centred largely around total deactivation of Irans nuclear facilities, a compromise too far for the Iranian government seeking to diversify its domestic energy production away from oil and gas.

This agreement allows Iran to continue pursuing its nuclear energy production targets. Though production is likely to be far more restricted and monitored under this agreement, the sacrifice is arguably worth the opportunity to redevelop both political and economic relations with the West. This is the issue that has generated the major threat of war in the region, particularly with Netanyahus zeal for military conflict. "The agreement... removes Irans nuclear programme from the danger list," says BBC Middle East Editor Jeremy Bowen. "Two years ago, as Israel threatened to bomb Iran, it looked likely to lead to a major Middle East war. That in itself is a major diplomatic achievement."

Hassan Rouhanis foreign policy is proving to be one
of wider diplomatic relations with the West
than his predecessors.
The Iranian government has received international recognition of its right to develop nuclear energy, something that undoubtedly played a significant role in motivating the Hassan Rouhani, as a President seeking to rebuild some of Irans relations with the rest of the world.

So, it could be said indeed that the economic sanctions played a role in bringing around this agreement on Irans nuclear program, but it would be perhaps too simplistic to conclude from this that the sanctions were successful on the whole. No doubt, those in Iran who suffered because of them are unlikely to forget soon, and furthermore the political implications of the agreement strongly suggest the sanctions may not have played the greatest role in bringing Iran to the table.

*The freezing of assets is when an individual or organisations assets (whether its a property, a business investment or bank accounts) are regulated to prevent the owner from selling or withdrawing them. For example, Irans Central Bank is believed to have up to $10bn in European central banks that is frozen- currently they cannot withdraw it.
Read More..